DollarsIn an earlier post regarding the proposed changes to the FLSA white collar exemption, I reminded employers not to forget to recalculate the regular rate for overtime purposes following payment of a bonus – resulting in an additional payment to employees.  However, this is an often overlooked concept and can be confusing.  So, I thought it would be worth a quick post to help clarify as it came up the other day with another employer.

Section 7(e) of the FLSA states that non-discretionary bonuses must be included as part of the employees “regular rate of pay”.  Because overtime must be paid as time and one-half of the regular rate, the regular rate then increases the overtime rate.  But, let’s break this down.  First, discretionary bonuses do not change the regular rate – it is one of eight types of payments that does not need to be included in the employees regular rate.  29 C.F.R. 778.208.  However, a non-discretionary bonus is not excluded from the type of remuneration for employment and thus must be included into the employees “regular rate”.

How Are Bonuses Included Into the Regular Rate in a Single Pay Period?

Let’s start simple.  If a non-discretionary bonus is paid because of an employee meeting a weekly goal, for example, that money is added to the employee’s other weekly earnings and divided by the amount of hours the employee worked that week.  For example, let’s say the employee earns $15/hr and worked 50 hours/wk.

Straight time pay = $15 x 50hrs = $750 (regular rate is $15)

Overtime pay = $15 * 0.5 = $7.50 (overtime premium) x 10hrs = $75.00

Total compensation before bonus = $750 (straight time) + $75 (overtime) = $825

Non-discretionary bonus paid = $25

Straight time pay after bonus = ($825 + 25)/50 = $17 (new regular rate)

Overtime rate after bonus = $17 * 0.5 = $8.50 (new overtime premium)

Additional hourly overtime due = $8.50 – $7.50 = $1/hr

Total additional overtime due = $1 * 10 = $10

Total compensation after bonus = $860

So, in this scenario, the employee who worked 10 hours of overtime and received a $25 non-discretionary bonus, should also receive an additional $10 for overtime pay in the next payroll (assuming the bonus is calculated after the weekly payroll is run).

How Are Bonuses Included Into the Regular Rate When It Covers Multiple Pay Periods?

Now, real world.   Continue Reading Paying An Additional Overtime Premium After A Non-Discretionary Bonus Payment – What?!

The Minnesota Prevailing Wage Act, Minn. Stat. 177.41 – 177.44, requires that employees working on public works be paid the “real value of the services they perform.”  Accordingly, Minnesota requires that “laborers, workers, and mechanics on projects financed in whole or part by state funds should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole.”  Iron workerIn short, employers working on a covered project must classify each employee into one of the pre-designated job labor code and class.  For example, the commercial labor codes and classes can be found here for Hennepin County effective 12-21-2015 and revised 3-14-2016.  What if a contractor’s job title is not listed?  The State of Minnesota provides a simple one-page form to ask the State for its opinion.

The form, Classification Clarification Request, can be found on the Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry’s website and, while the simple one page request seems harmless, it is anything but. Contractors should keep in mind that when you submit MNDOLI’s Classification Clarification Request form, generally, you are going to be stuck with the answer you get.  In other words, it is not something that should be taken lightly, and you should do your homework ahead of time – this is more like an argument than a request.  The tasks and tools used should most closely match your suggested classification, otherwise, MNDOLI’s answer may not match your own and then you are stuck with an adverse determination, opening the door for a dispute over the proper payment of prevailing wages.  Keep in mind that Minnesota Administrative Rules 5200.1000 – 5200.1120 sets forth MNDOLI’s rules relating to the procedures for prevailing wage determinations, including job classification descriptions for laborers and special crafts.  If your duties match one of these descriptions very closely, don’t be surprised when that is the suggested classification – even if different than what you use in another state or on a Davis-Bacon (Federal) prevailing wage project.

DOL iphone-logoOn March 14, 2016, the Department of Labor submitted its “Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees” final proposed rule to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.  Commonly referred to as the “white collar exemption”, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) provides that all employees (subject to the FLSA) are entitled to overtime…unless…they are otherwise exempt.

Changing Weekly Wage Thresholds

Currently, one of the thresholds for “executive, administrative or professional employees” is that the employee must be paid a salary of at least $455/week ($23,660/year).  The significant change is that this base threshold will be increased to $921/week ($47,892/year).  The same sort of threshold for “highly compensated employees” is being increased from $100,000/year to $122,148/year.  Notably, unlike before (the previous thresholds were set in 2004), the new rule provides that the salary and compensation thresholds will be updated on an annual basis with 60 days notice in the Federal Register.  In addition, the revisions will clarify that an employer may pay an exempt employee additional compensation (bonus) without violating the salary basis requirement, so long as the employee makes the minimum $921 per week.

“White Collar” Work Still Required

Having done my fair share of wage and hour audits for employers, and defending lawsuits regarding overtime misclassification (exempt v non-exempt), this new rule actually is not too far off from reality from what I’d find after a quick review of a job description.  Two workersEmployees who are classified as exempt but making less than $50,000 – that is a number I often use when doing the first sweep for potential misclassifications (I like round numbers) – are rarely properly classified.  If an employee is making less than $50,000, the chances are pretty low that he or she: (1) has primary duty of the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations; (2) has independent discretion with matters of significance or supervises two or more employees; or (3) is in an advanced field of science or other specialized prolonged education background, is a specialized creative artistic field, is a school teacher, or computer analyze/programmer/engineer.

43 Million Workers Will Be “Misclassified” – Time to Audit

The Department of Labor estimates this regulation revision will affect 43 million workers, 21.4 of them misclassified as executive, administrative or professional employees.  So, how do employers handle the new regulations?  First, now is the perfect time to do an internal wage and hour audit with employment law counsel and get your ducks in a row.  It is not every year that employers who may have one (or several) employees on the fence, have a good reason to look at and reclassify employees.  It is not usual for an employer during a wage and hour lawsuit to look at payroll practices and then realize that as the company has grown or job descriptions change, employees may not be properly classified.  How do they fix it without throwing out red flags to employees that they may have been misclassified (and thus owed backwages, etc.)?  Enter the regulation overhaul.  Now is the time to do that audit, or shortly after the new rule is finalized, and make a sweep of your salaried classifications.

There are certainly employee perks with being paid a salary (consistent minimum paycheck) – and many will take a re-classification to non-exempt as a demotion of sorts.  Accordingly, how can an employer handle this issue with an employee who is seen as professional but makes less than the threshold?  Don’t forget – the FLSA mandates that overtime be paid after 40 hours a week.  That does not mean the employee cannot be paid a salary PLUS overtime!  I shock many employers with this little known concept.

Regulations Still Allow Salary PLUS Overtime – Bridge For Transitioning to an “Hourly” Employee

So, here it is… an employee who is not exempt from the overtime regulations must be paid time and a half (1.5) for all hours worked over 40 in a week (unless they are paid under the fluctuating workweek method, but that’s a whole other issue for mostly seasonal employers).  That employee may be paid hourly plus overtime or a salary plus overtime.  An hourly employee is going to have fluctuating hours each paycheck typically – some weeks he or she may be paid less than 40 hours, some weeks more (unless you prohibit overtime which is also okay so long as you pay when they go over – you can still discipline for that).  This is typical for a “blue collar” type worker.  However, many office workers or lower sales type folks would expect a salary.  That employee may be paid a set weekly salary plus overtime.  DollarsSome weeks that employee may work less than 40 hours, but they still get their salary.  If they work more than 40 hours they get their salary plus overtime.  Yes, the employer ends up paying more, but this is a very common occurrence in middle management, new professionals, or long-term highly valued support staff or other employees.

Don’t Forget About Bonuses Affecting Overtime!

Last cautionary note (I could talk about wage and hour all day)…don’t forget about bonuses for non-exempt employees!  If a non-exempt employee is paid a non-discretionary bonus, that bonus must be layered into the corresponding pay period and included in the “regular rate” (hourly rate) in order to determine the rate for overtime.  This is something that few employers realize, and many dread as an administrative nightmare.  Not only is the issue of a bonus discretionary or non-discretionary, but then how it affects the regular rate can be daunting.  For example, after paying a non-discretionary bonus, the employer has to go back and pay an additional amount for the overtime hours worked.  But I digress and get off track – if you want a quick overview – the DOL has some great examples.

In short, the final rule is coming, so it is now the time to embrace the change and prepare for its enactment.  If you haven’t done a wage and hour audit from top to bottom, now is the time.  It is easy to knock out the top and the bottom folks, but it is the middle that employers need to take a good, hard look at.

Bible at workEver say “bless you” after someone sneezes? Well of course, it’s rude not to, right? So I was taught… How about “wear church clothes” when someone asks you how to dress? Until recently, I have never given it a second thought. However, a unique religious discrimination charge recently had me diving into religious discrimination cases where I came upon the phrase “wear church clothes” used by an employer to an employee (who happened to be Muslim and thus did not appreciate the reference). How that case shook out is a bit of a long story, you can read it here, but it got me thinking that employers (and their supervisors) should be cautious when using phrases with good intentions, yet with historically religious connotations.

So, why am I sharing this, other than I had my own “light bulb” moment this week? On March 8, the Department of Justice announced a new inter-agency initiative, “Combating Religious Discrimination”. Continue Reading DOJ Announces New Inter-Agency Initiative “Combating Religious Discrimination”

Effective May 10, 2016, graduate students on an F-1 visa who are on a STEM OPT (12 months) may apply for a 24 month (versus 17) extension.

Startup Stock Photos

The Final Rule, published by the Department of Homeland Security on March 11, conceivably provides employers with three chances to apply for an H-1B immigrant visa following the student’s graduation from an accredited school.  However, if it looks too good to be true…it probably is.  There is, as always, a caveat. Continue Reading DHS Final Rule Extends STEM OPT Extensions to 24 Months – Adding Numerous Employer Requirements

Computer stethescopeOn March 11, 2016, the US DOL WHD extended the comment period through April 12, 2016 for its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking implementing Executive Order 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors.
First published on February 25, 2016, the proposed rule seeks to implement the Executive Order signed by President Obama on September 7, 2015.  The proposed rule requires employers who enter into federal covered contracts (such as those prevailing wage jobs under the Davis-Bacon Act) to provide covered employees with up to 7 days of paid sick leave per year, including paid leave for family care.   

The proposed rule is anticipated to affect over 828,000 employees and would apply to new contracts and renewed contracts from solicitations issued on or after January 1, 2017 – or awarded thereafter.  Specifically, the rule would put many new burdens on employers with respect to paid sick leave.  Under the proposed rule, employees must accrue at least 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked in connection with a covered contracts – calculated at the end of each workweek.  Or, covered contractors can provide an employee with at least 56 hours of paid sick leave at the beginning of each accrual year (administratively easier).  In addition, the proposed rule mandates that employees must be informed in writing at least once a month regarding their amount of accrued paid sick leave.

Under the proposed rule, employers can limit the amount of paid sick leave to 56 hours per year, or may allow employees to carry over accrued, unused leave to the following year (and to cap it to 56 hours at any one point in time).  If terminated employers are not required to pay out unused sick time, however, if the employee is rehired withing 12 months, the employer must reinstate the employee’s unused paid sick time.

What will employees be able to use it for?  Among the usual suspects – actually being sick – they can also use it for caring for other family members who need care, as well as domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking (if time away is for illness, injury, counseling, relocation, legal action, etc.).  Paid sick leave must be in increments of no more than 1 hour, and employees must be paid the same pay and benefits they would have received if they haven’t been used (this is where it is going to get tricky when an employee works on multiple sites, perhaps with different (or no) prevailing wage rates during a single week or even day).  In short – nothing has been finalized yet, but federal contractors should know that it is likely coming this year, and to prepare for policies and procedures to handle the same in 2017.  For example, the use of paid time off (PTO) may be a consideration for employers currently providing vacation plus sick leave.  Stay tuned!

Computerized_time_clockAs will happen from time-to-time, several employers have called me with the same issue this week, “Do I have to pay an employee who quit and didn’t turn in their time sheet? I have no idea how many hours he worked as I’m in an office in Bloomington and the employee was on a job site!” Now, I know all you super-smart HR professionals (yes, you know who you are because you’re reading this!) know that the FLSA has a record keeping requirement. And I know you know that the employer has to keep records for 3 years of the employee’s time worked. However, this also means that the FLSA (and many state wage and hour laws) require the employer to keep the employee’s time – not the employee!

Yes, I’m talking in circles, but it’ll make sense shortly… Continue Reading Paying Employees Who Quit and Don’t Turn in Their Time Card – Impossible! *NOT*

On January 20, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division issued Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2016-1DOL Wage Hr DivThe guidance letter issued by DOL Administrator David Weil provides expansive definitions of joint employment—broader than the common law test, the OSHA test, and the NLRB’s new Browning-Ferris test, ensuring “that the scope of employment relationships and joint employment under the FLSA and MSPA is as broad as possible.”    Businesses in the construction, staffing, janitorial, warehouse, restaurant, and hospitality industries, as well as any business that provides or uses contract labor, are particularly likely to be impacted by this letter.

While this sounds illogical, under the FLSA, an employee can actually have two employers while performing the same work.   Continue Reading DOL Issues Administration Interpretation Letter Expanding Definition of “Joint Employment”

MoneyOn February 25, 2016, MNDOLI issued its 2015 Minnesota Minimum Wage Report.  The report details trends and statistics with respect to minimum wage workers in Minnesota, but seemingly only to “toot” Minnesota’s own horn. Adjusted for inflation, Federal minimum wage has dropped 26% from 1974 to 2013, while Minnesota’s minimum wage is about 2% more than it was in 1974.  This means that Minnesota’s employers are paying more now for minimum wage workers than it was in 1974. Continue Reading Minnesota Minimum Wage Report Issued – Noting Differences Between Federal and Minnesota Minimum Wage